What Kind Of Weave Do Tia

Top 5 horror movies in history

This type of ranking, so much like people, not are always entirely welcome. Especially the difficulty of deciding to make a list so small, with much material to choose from and so many fans (and detractors) still sting with a stinger.

Therefore, dear readers, I encourage you, not without fear of reprisal, to make a biweekly ranking on various film categories: best film, best special effects, better scripts and the like. And this week, to open the Pandora's box of the furies within each one of you, I've decided to start with the top 5 horror movies in history (I'll make one on the most recent).

Eye! They are the ones I liked, at least this time, but the list is drawn up trying to be objective: what they meant for the history of cinema, or rather, for the spectators.

5. Shark

Serving, incidentally, a tribute to the late Roy Scheider, Jaws open the list as one of the movies that impact occurred in the population, not by his terror, but because it greatly increased the fear of water, especially when swimming at the beaches ... Mythical soundtrack of this film that marked the sky to Steven Spielberg.

4. Psycho

I'm not at all, lover of the cinema of "genius" of cinema, Alfred Hitchcock. Nor is I who doubt it, but it will establish. Anyway, I decided to include it because it has one of the most memorable scenes of the story and that marked a before and after. Scored, and much, several generations ... Although I dare say, probably, with other eyes, never again say the same.

3. The Shining

Despite having a lousy dubbing in Spain, this adaptation of Stephen King's novel is considered one of the best horror films ever. As far as I'm concerned, I just seemed great for a huge Jack Nicholson and that millisecond bloody scene with the twin daughters (...), but could not include it. "Here's Jaaaaack!"

2. Nightmare on Elm Street

A "must". Freddy Krueger murderer is probably the most typical horror film. By 'good' by Wes Craven came up with the idea that you could die in your sleep ... and so did millions of teenagers cry before going to bed, for fear they could dream ... or move .

1. The Exorcist

The first match has undoubtedly the film that has created more trauma in the audience. Movie banned in many countries, which had over a soundtrack of luxury (thanks to Mike Oldfield and Tubullar Bells), is a milestone in film history. Many, many people say that even today are still closing their eyes and seeing the beautiful creature fierce by Linda Blair, lying in that bed ... or down those stairs.

Now get back playing and a half between MENDOS sacrilege: How many purists will fall on me?

Montell Jordan Multiplicity

Predictor of The Critic

How important I feel after writing that title, right? Well, joking aside, I make this post now that the Oscars are just around the corner, to discuss the nominations this year and make my predictions (and we pass all) about what will happen at the gala.

As I said a few days for me, this year's Oscar are decaffeinated : it is inexplicable how all Zodiac and American Gangster are not nominated in the best categories (especially direction, both). Denzel Washington also deserved a nomination for lead actor, especially considering that Tommy Lee Jones appears in that category: it is a good actor, but ... anyone who has seen "No Country for Old Men" tells me where the reason for his nomination? certainly do vastly better Josh Brolin.

too I have never shared the view of the Academy at the time of the year award ... and I think there is at least understanding. Neither Juno or No Country for Old Men movies I think are significant as the year's best. " The first because it was very nice, yes, but then which is mounted is a stretch (although very well Ellen Page). And second because it seems that everything that bears the stamp of the Coen has to be the host. And it does not. The film of these particular brothers is a clear example of how the inertia of the criticism makes it all can they drop at your feet: where is the masterpiece that saw many of them?

Although it is not at all a bad movie, I thought it rather tedious (disconnection in the final scene was almost complete) and only saved by his performances (great Bardem) and a mildly interesting story . Little more. Echo

missing from all the nominations for best actor Mark Ruffalo side, apart from Denzel Washington, David Fincher, Ridley Scott, Zodiac, American Gangster, the Into the Wild soundtrack ... including Josh Brolin. -------------

Here are my predictions:

Best Picture: 'No Country for Old Men Best Director
: The Coen brothers 'No Country for Old Men'

Best Actor: Daniel Day Lewis for 'There Will Be Blood'
Best Supporting Actor: Javier Bardem for 'No Country for Old Men "
Best Actress: Julie Christie for' Away From Her '
Best Supporting Actress: Cate Blanchett ' I'm Not There '

Best Original Screenplay: Juno Best Adapted Screenplay
: 'The Diving Bell and the Butterfly'

Myammee 2010 Calendar

Let's talk about you want (IV) Special

As I promised. Once again, I make this post to talk more quietly on any matter you ask me:)

Heath Ledger. am getting a bit more than it should in theory. Do not understand how a talented actor, at the peak of his career with wife and daughter, can end his life. It is very sad news, and the night could not believe I found it incomprehensible that I found ... It was not my favorite actor, but he never did wrong. I remember him especially for Brokeback and Monster's Ball .. and sure I would have done even more for The Dark Knight. Hopefully your Joker is remembered for a landmark, and not by this tragic news.

Last Train to Auschwitz. films about the Holocaust have in their favor, without a doubt, playing a issue that concerns us all ... But it is against that and there are many. And perhaps most try to touch us in the same way. If they do it all, just tired. Hope it is not the case with this film you mentioned. I will try to see it;)

Olga Kurylenko. Yes, I've seen, but hey, I'll save the comments about it, for the sake of the blog (and mine ...:) If you say I hope this new film is at least as above. I will be satisfied.

Tim Burton. I really like his movies. Edward Scissorhands, Charlie and The Chocolate Factory, Corpse Bride, And especially Mars Attacks, Big Fish, I think good movies. Do not drink the Batman, because I seem a little infumables. And it is precisely because the character, because I really liked Nolan. Anyway, my love for Burton not to consider swallow as a musical ... can not stand.

Prodi. I assume from your comment that you've smoked something;) Polish twins cause me disgust, but since you name it, just think of the English political scene me shudder ... 9-M Go ahead. Exile may be close, but thanks to recent smart moves by the Genoese, probably remains in Madrid and I will InterRail for 4 years running. Jim Carrey would say: "a lack of bread, cookies are good."

Lost. Lost say they do not already said ... I watched the first episode of the fourth season, after the endless waiting and already he missed ... I just hope the writers strike is not eternal "fuck" series and plot.

Sean Penn. I love Sean Penn. As an actor I feel "great." And recently I've seen his latest film, "Into the Wild", which I liked a lot: very personal and a direction, although sometimes tiresome, it also rates and details, although I must say that the history of that part is great. Attention to the soundtrack. I have not done criticism for lack of time, I'll see if I later ...

Thank you all for the encouragement received in recent weeks:) I hope these two years of the blog again ... but I guess everything has a purpose. Hopefully as late as possible ...

Italianos Incesto Gratis

Canon Digital

digital Canon seems like a joke. crime in Spain is not downloadable movies. Or share music or anything. Yes, provided that no profit. not me talking, says the Criminal Code. And this is true as a temple, do not be fooled.

With this in mind, it seems incredible that we have to pay a "fee" from which they profit only the SGAE **** for something that is not a crime. I understand that we can not benefit from the work of others without paying a dime. Copyright yes ... but not at any price. never understand why I have to pay a few euros more for buying a hard drive or a computer screen, and only by chance that they would use to copy and / or download material . But where have we come? You really are losses due to piracy, or because they intend to make figures that go beyond what is reasonable? Spiderman 3 has gained about 1000 million dollars worldwide. The film, as I recall, cost about 300. Please, what do we mean then?

Is it really because the English authors want to charge more, and it will take a picture with Zapatero to say they can not eat because of piracy? Why do I have to put a guy like Alejandro Sanz tell me that, with the amount of money you have, and knowing exactly what indiscriminate canon?

I repeat, if someone has a right, has to defend ... but we must remind Mr. Sanz, for example, that we live . Of the listeners (not including me) music. Of those who are interested in it, and get paid for their concerts. Can not given (n) notice that the sound of his music, we are creating fame? What that actually benefits them? What is not permissible is to have to pay 20 euros for a CD of music that most songs do not like. I'm not going to pay 20 euros for two songs. Neither I nor anyone with half a brain. And if neither heard his songs, he would go running out of money ...

also why someone has to pay extra for a CD, if you use it to record personal files? Or simply due to labor? Does this mean a preventive measure? Wow, better not let us out there, it reminds me of preventive a. ..

will count two real cases: years ago when the legendary Napster was the most used P2P program in the world, had to close for an application (in USA), by copyright. Offspring was one of the groups that supported explicitly to the platform, because they understood that, with this type of program, users share their music and they are revealed. and confessed that what they earned more money, it was with concerts, not CDs. This reminds me of a certain professor of mine, we are encouraged to photocopy the book, as the "lost profits" was not significant (in fact, took the euro meant that profit, and threw it out the window.)

Another case is the latest and of course, Radiohead. Internet put on his new album, and allowed each user to download it for free or pay what they deemed appropriate. The end result was that Radiohead made more money this way than any other previous record (and why the "media" of money paid by each listener was 4 euros). 4 euros! And we charge 20 in the shops ...

Well, actually I consider unacceptable that by buying a phone that has MP3, you have to pay about 10 euros. Or even to have DSL (it claims as the sky). And is supposed to be "in compensation." But I say ... "in return for what, when, remember, we are not committing any criminal act? Not even a loss! I can not stop going to the cinema to see a movie downloaded from my computer ... Being able to download a movie does not mean "pass" to go to the movies ... if I see one, you do not worth paying for a cinema ticket (or music CD or whatever). So ... he really is a waste the artist / author?

Alexander, I would never buy an album I own!